FG to Borrow Additional N1trn to Support Fuel Subsidy

…Not excited by High Crude Prices- Akabueze 

By Joseph Amah, Abuja 


The federal government will need to borrow an additional N1 trillion to offset the cost of fuel subsidy while states and local governments in the country would suffer an estimated loss of N1.5 trillion in revenue.

These according to  the Director General of the Budget Office of the Federation, Mr. Ben Akabueze are the consequences of the government’s decision to retain fuel subsidies in the 2022 budget.

Akabueze also stated that the Federal Government was not excited about the rising prices of crude oil in the international market as long as fuel subsidies regime remained in Nigeria’s domestic market.


He was speaking, during a webinar that was organised by the Financial Institutions Training Centre (FITC), under its National Economic Development Outlook Series 2022 with the theme, “Rebooting the Economy: The Path to Sustainable Growth.”


He said: “Regrettably, for those of us on the fiscal side, the expectation of high oil price does not excite us as long as this subsidy regime remains because crude oil price is the biggest factor in the price of refined oil products. Above the price of $63 per barrel the impact on us fiscally will be negative with this subsidy regime. Higher dollar revenue will strengthen the external sector but the impact on government revenue is negative.”


He also explained that the net impact of the decision to retain fuel subsidy is that the federal government’s budget deficit will rise, “but by the way you need to understand that this subsidy cost is borne not just by the federal government but by all the tiers of government because it is charged at the Federation Account level.


“As you heard from the Minister of Finance, the Nigeria National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) has indicated that it would require N3 trillion to cover this subsidy in 2022. Out of which we have (previously) provided N443 billion. So, we have to provide additional N2.5 trillion at the federation level.


“The federal government takes up N1 trillion of the sum and the deficit go up by that number. And because there is no corresponding revenue, debt borrowing will go up by N1 trillion. That is the cost of decision that it appears that the majority of Nigerians favoured. This is a democracy and government has to listen to the voice of the people.”


Akabueze also cleared the illusion in the minds of many Nigerians that high oil prices automatically translate to increased public revenue and savings in the Excess Crude Account.


He added, “The excess crude account does not receive accretion by just subtracting the price you get from the budget reference price. It is only when the revenue from oil exceeds what was projected in the budget that you have the excess. But the fact is that we haven’t had it for a long time. Last year oil price was in the high $60 but our revenue collection was N1 trillion less than what we projected even though oil price was significantly above the budget reference price simply because subsidy ate up a significant portion of it.”


He also argued that the country’s debt service to revenue ratio is high not because, “we are borrowing too much or that we are paying too much for our debt but because we are generating too little revenue. The other important ratio that we need to look at is the revenue to the GDP ratio compared to some African countries. Nigeria is at least one third of the average in terms of our revenue to GDP ratio. That is what needs to improve.”


He also blamed the structural imbalance in the country’s economy as one of the reasons why federal revenue ratio to the GDP has always remained very low.


“For instance, agriculture contributes close to a quarter of our GDP but yields less than one per cent to government revenue because of the structure of that sector that is largely informal and not taxable. These are the things we need to look into. Nigeria’s economic problem is largely structural. Even our high inflation is driven largely by structural factors.


“That is why reform is so critical. We need to reform this system. We need strong voices supporting agents of reforms in the government,” Akabueze said.


Speaking, the Chief Consultant of B. Adedipe Associates Limited, Dr. Biodun Adedipe, who made the key presentation during the webinar, said that Nigeria would snatch its economy from circles of recession by ending the era of depending on crude oil as its major source of public revenue, policy inconsistency, over dependence on import and low national productivity.

Adedipe projected that the manufacturing sector would be a major driver of the GDP in 2022.


“There are three reasons why I took the position that manufacturing will produce growth. The first reason is related to the intervention funds pumped by the Central Bank of Nigeria into the manufacturing sector. The second reason is the positive PMIs report that tells us what the future of that sector will be in terms of expansion. Third, is the steady inflow of FDIs and number four is the import data that showed that half of the country’s import in 2021 went to the manufacturing sector, ”he said.


The Managing Director/Chief Executive Officer of the FITC, Ms. Chizor Malize, also expected growth to come from the oil and gas sector and the financial sector of the nation’s economy.




Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here